Four UK offices with contacts worldwide - call us now on 0845 561 0059
Social media could put an end to your chosen career

Social media could put an end to your chosen career

Social media could put an end to your chosen career

The BBC was itself in the news this past week rather than reporting it. Many of the newspapers picked up  on two of the people they had used to ask questions in the recent Conservative party leadership debate that was aired earlier in the week.

The issue was around the vetting of these individuals.

Lets be realistic here. How long ago had these people applied to be on the programme and how long had the BBC had to vett them properly? For a full vetting process to be completed, how far should you go back?

Dependent upon the depth of the report required and the relevance to the situation this should be the answer. Vetting is a useful tool in particular for two situatioins in the employment sector. Firstly, for a new member of staff when they are being recruited – particularly say if they are under 25 years of age. Secondly, would you look at someones background again if they were in line for a promotion to say Director level? You wouldn’t want to appoint someone and then find out later they had a somewhat colourful history. Starting again with the recruitment process can be time consuming and costly.

A guide to full vetting would include:

Full identity checks eg passport, birth certificate, drivers licence, bank statement

Residential check – current and all previous addresses

Confirmed education including qualifications

Financial history

Full employment/unemployment history

Personal referees

Directorships

Social media eg Facebook, Twitter, Instagram

It is often this last point in these times of instant reaction to say politial, sports or TV events that could catch someone out. Commenting about a bad decision in a football match is small fry compared to stating that an individual is a **** and should be **********.

So, as a general rule, check out the person is who they say they are and if in doubt, dig a little deeper.

Fraud in UK social housing costs £1bn per year

Fraud in UK social housing costs £1bn per year

Fraud in UK social housing costs £1bn per year

Across the UK it is estimated that 50,000 housing association and council homes are occupied by someone who shouldn’t live there or have obtained the tenancy fraudulently.

These can fall into several categories:

  • Unlawful subletting– where a tenant lets out their council or housing association home without the knowledge or permission of their landlord. They often continue to pay the rent for the property directly to their landlord, but charge the person they are subletting to a much higher rate. It is unlawful and unfair to sublet and to profit from a property which could be given to someone legally entitled to occupy it. The Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 makes it a criminal offence for a tenant to sublet their home. The maximum penalty is a two-year jail sentence and a fine of up to £50,000. The court also has the power to make the tenant pay back any profits made through subletting.
  • Obtaining housing by deception– where a person gets a council or housing association home by giving false information in their application, for example not telling the landlord they are renting another council or housing association property or giving false information about who lives with them.
  • Wrongly claimed succession– where a tenant dies and someone, who is not entitled to, tries to take over or succeed the tenancy. For example, they might say they lived with the tenant before they died, when in fact they were living elsewhere.
  • Key selling– where a tenant is paid to pass on their keys in return for a one-off payment

Social housing is a valuable national asset with over four million social housing properties in England providing homes for many low income households and families. At a time when demand for social housing is outstripping supply it is estimated that up to 50,000 homes may be unlawfully sublet which equates to more than 1 in 100 housing association and council homes across England. With temporary accommodation for homeless families costing Councils’ around £18,000 per family, per year, the public purse is being depleted to the tune of nearly £1 billion per annum.

Related image

What can be done about this?

From a practical point of view is it viable to go around all of the Council and Housing Association properties in the whole of the country? Probably not, but better ways of vetting people initially through specific forms of identification being requested, checking bank statements, a visit to a previous address when a new tenancy starts or encouraging other tenants to inform the relevant authority on potential subletting, could yeild dividends.

Sources. Town and Country Housing/Peabody Group and The Audit Commission